Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Geriatrics ; (12): 14-17, 2019.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-734504

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of solitaire stent thrombectomy versus intravenous thrombolysis for treatment of elderly stroke patients with acute vertebrobasilar occlusion.Methods Clinical data of 76 patients with acute vertebrobasilar occlusion at the neurology department of Anyang People's Hospital from May 2014 to July 2017 were retrospectively analyzed.Patients were divided into two groups:solitaire stent thrombectomy group (n =30)and intravenous thrombolysis group (n =46).Recanalization rates,score improvement rate in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NHISS)after 24 hours of treatment,symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rate and mortality at 90 days after treatment were compared between the two groups.Results The recanalization rate,NIHSS score improvement rate at 24 hours after treatment and the improvement rate of Modified Rankin Scale(mRS)score at 90 days after treatment were significantly higher in the solitaire stent thrombectomy group than in the intravenous thrombolysis group[86.7% (26/30)vs.45.7%(21/46),66.7%(20/30)vs.34.8%(16/46),53.3% (16/30)vs.23.9%(11/46),x2 =6.543,3.900 and 3.761,P =0.012,0.041 and 0.046,respectively].No significant difference in incidence of intracranial hemorrhage was found between the two groups [6.7 % (2/30) vs.19.6 % (9/46),x2=0.813,P=0.357].The mortality at 90 days after treatment were significantly lower in the solitaire stent thrombectomy group than in the intravenous thrombolysis group [0.0% (0/30)vs.30.4% (14/46),P =0.017].Conclusions Solitaire stent thrombectomy versus intravenous thrombolysis has better efficacy and higher safety in treating acute stroke due to vertebrobasilar occlusion in elderly patients.

2.
Chongqing Medicine ; (36): 2162-2164, 2018.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-692074

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare clinical characteristics between acute exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) patients with chronic bronchitis phenotype and emphysema phenotype.Methods A total of 73 AECOPD patients with chronic bronchitis phenotype and 82 AECOPD patients with emphysema phenotype in Tibet Chengdu Branch Hospital,West China Hospital,Sichuan University from January 2014 to November 2016 were selected.All patients had completed lung function tests,basic information collection,modified medical research council dyspnea scale (MMRC),and COPD assessment test (CAT).The serum samples were collected to detect C-reactive protein (CRP).The clinical characteristics,lung function,complications and systemic inflammation between the two groups were compared.Results There was no difference in body mass index (BMI),CAT score,serum CRP level and length of hospital stay between the AECOPD patients with chronic bronchitis phenotype and emphysema phenotype (P>0.05).Compared with AECOPD patients with chronic bronchitis phenotype,the AECOPD patients with emphysema phenotype have longer smoking history,higher MMRC score,and more severe lung function impairment (P<0.05).Conclusion AECOPD patients with chronic bronchitis phenotype and emphysema phenotype have different clinical characteristics,those with emphysema phenotype have more severe dyspnea and lung function impairment.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL